為了更有利于對(duì)埋地天然氣管道的長(zhǎng)期跟蹤定位管理，需要對(duì)示蹤線的性能進(jìn)行測(cè)試，以選擇更合適的示蹤線。因此，我們對(duì)燃?xì)夤艿乐谐Ｓ玫氖聚櫨€進(jìn)行了測(cè)試，從示蹤線電導(dǎo)率、示蹤線接頭防腐處理、示蹤線強(qiáng)度等方面為天然氣管道示蹤線的選擇提供參考。

In order to facilitate the long-term tracking and positioning management of buried natural gas pipelines, it is necessary to test the performance of the tracer line to select a more appropriate tracer line. Therefore, we have tested the commonly used tracer lines in gas pipelines to provide reference for the selection of tracer lines in natural gas pipelines from the aspects of tracer line conductivity, anti-corrosion treatment of tracer line joints, and tracer line strength.

測(cè)試概述

Test overview

，將銅包鋼、銅芯線、銅包鋁三根示蹤線埋在同一條PE燃?xì)夤艿郎戏?。PE管道全長(zhǎng)約717m，然后對(duì)接頭的導(dǎo)電性和防腐性進(jìn)行測(cè)試。性能和強(qiáng)度，其次是數(shù)據(jù)分析，對(duì)示蹤劑進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià)。

First, the copper-clad steel, copper core wire and copper-clad aluminum are buried above the same PE gas pipeline. The total length of PE pipe is about 717m, and then the conductivity and corrosion resistance of the joint are tested. Performance and strength, followed by data analysis, comprehensive evaluation of the tracer.

測(cè)試項(xiàng)目

Test items

①使用PCM管道電流衰減率法測(cè)試評(píng)估各種示蹤線對(duì)檢測(cè)信號(hào)的導(dǎo)通情況；

① PCM pipeline current decay rate method is used to test and evaluate the conduction of various trace line pairs;

②對(duì)各種示蹤線施工過程中接頭的防腐處理進(jìn)行測(cè)試，評(píng)估示蹤線在長(zhǎng)期埋藏后是否能保持連接不被腐蝕和斷裂；

② Test the anti-corrosion treatment of joints during the construction of various trace lines, and evaluate whether the trace lines can keep the connection from corrosion and fracture after long-term burial;

③測(cè)試評(píng)估3條示蹤線是否同時(shí)埋設(shè)在某段PE燃?xì)夤艿郎?，能否?zhǔn)確定位管道空間位置。

③ Test and evaluate whether the three tracing lines are buried on a PE gas pipeline at the same time, and whether the spatial position of the pipeline can be accurately located.

檢測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)分析

Test data analysis

①檢測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)系統(tǒng)分析表明，銅包鋼、銅芯線、銅包鋁三種示蹤線在相同交叉條件下，檢測(cè)電流的信號(hào)傳導(dǎo)無明顯差異。截面積。兩條鋁包線的走線傳導(dǎo)信號(hào)幾乎一樣，銅芯線的走線傳導(dǎo)信號(hào)稍好一些，但沒有顯著差異。

① The systematic analysis of the test data shows that there is no significant difference in the signal conduction of the test current under the same crossing conditions for the three kinds of trace wires: copper-clad steel, copper core wire and copper-clad aluminum. Sectional area. The routing conductive signals of the two aluminum clad wires are almost the same, and the routing conductive signals of the copper core wire are slightly better, but there is no significant difference.

②三種燃?xì)馐聚櫨€在接頭的防腐處理上有很大的不同。在測(cè)試中，這三根示蹤線的接頭處都存在漏電問題，尤其是銅包鋁，漏電接頭較多。這些泄漏點(diǎn)埋藏時(shí)間長(zhǎng)了，示蹤線就會(huì)被腐蝕斷開，失去示蹤對(duì)管道的作用。銅芯線示蹤線接頭經(jīng)過良好的防腐處理，僅發(fā)現(xiàn)一處漏電問題，其次是銅包鋼示蹤線。

② There are great differences among the three kinds of fuel gas tracing lines in the anti-corrosion treatment of joints. During the test, there were leakage problems at the joints of the three trace wires, especially the copper-clad aluminum, with many leakage joints. If these leakage points are buried for a long time, the tracing line will be corroded and disconnected, and the tracing effect on the pipeline will be lost. After good anti-corrosion treatment, only one leakage problem was found in the copper core tracer wire joint, followed by the copper-clad steel tracer wire.

以上就是問題解答的相關(guān)內(nèi)容了，希望能夠幫助到大家，如對(duì)這一問題還存在任何疑問，都?xì)g迎關(guān)注我們網(wǎng)站http://m.tianyals.cn并咨詢我們的工作人員，將竭誠(chéng)為您服務(wù)。

The above is the relevant content of the question answer. I hope it can help you. If you still have any questions about this problem, you are welcome to follow our website http://m.tianyals.cn And consult our staff, will serve you wholeheartedly.